Yuku Supporter Free Trial!

All you have to do is pay…

I kid you not: there is apparently a one month free trial period for Yuku Supporter - basically a way to hide adverts from Yuku message boards if you pay $7 for six months:

“Become a Yuku Supporter!

Welcome to the Yuku Supporter purchase screen. Here you can upgrade to or renew your Yuku Supporter account for your username, giving your username premium status including no ads and special features.
As a new Yuku Supporter subscriber, you are qualified for a one month free trial period.”

Great! So where’s the option to select the free one month trial? You can only select $7 for six months or $12 for 12 months.

It must be on the next screen. Check the box that says you agree to the Yuku T&Cs and on we go.

“Selected Subscription Options

You have selected:

Six months subscription for $7 USD without Automatic Renewal.

You are qualified for a one month free trial period.”

Woohoo! On we go. We’re now taken to PayPal and for some reason they want to charge me $7 still.

Where’s my one month free trial period?

Oh and you know the bit where it says “giving your username premium status including no ads”? Well that’s not strictly accurate either:

http://support.yuku.com/topic/4922/t/Gold-community-and-yuku-supporter.html?page=-1

“Yuku supporters will not see yuku placed ads, but they will see any ads placed by board admins.”

So “no ads” means “ads”. Ah I see.

So then. Back to the question of the supposed one month free trial. How do we sign up for free?

http://support.yuku.com/topic/4904/t/One-month-yuku-supporter-free-trial.html

“if you pay for it, you get a month free thrown in. You don’t get a free month to try it first. The free month is a reward for paying.”

Oh I see! So the one month free trial isn’t a one month free trial after all. It’s a one month subscription extension once you’ve paid.

More creative use of language or misleading information depending on whether you’re ezboard, Inc. or the rest of the world…

visordown.com – Alternatives?

So then, given it is abundantly clear that the new Visordown is how it’s going to stay, I decided to do something about it. The alternatives were to put up and shut up, start a new message board or join another one and effectively leave Visordown behind.

Now, what makes a decent message board are first and foremost the people who post on it and secondly the software that runs it.

So I posted this suggestion on visordown.com:

“The old visordown.com was running vBulletin software which is just about to have a major upgrade released: see this thread over on vBulletin.

Now, although I can see why this change has taken place from the owners’ perspective, from the users’ perspective it’s not been a complete success, shall we say, with lots of folk asking for the old visordown.com back.

So what if something the same only new, starting from scratch was to be offered?

I have a spare licence for vBulletin that I am happy to pay to upgrade and install on a server somewhere. I have a couple of domain names regsitered that might be suitable:

TrackDayHero.com (currently pointing at my blog); or

BikeChatBoard.com (ditto).

I’d start by running Google Ads and a supporter scheme with benefits for supporters, so just like the old VD really. No publishing house looking over our shoulders, so perhaps more relaxed?

So, would anyone be interested?”

There was a lot of interest, but I was also reminded about the Revcounter which is shortly to be ported over to vBulletin and already has some of the old Visordown members on there. So to avoid duplication, my suggestion is on the back-burner and can be set up if needs be. In the meantime, I’ve changed the redirect for www.bikechatboard.com to the Revcounter.

visordown.com – An Object Lesson

Once upon a time, a motorcycle journalist and his friend set up an online discussion forum for motorcyclists and called it visordown.com

The forum software they were using was vBulletin which is very fine indeed and the site became a great success. That success led to Ben Cope selling advertising space on the board and serving ads. as well as setting up a supporter scheme to suppress those ads. and presumably putting some of that revenue into the hosting and software costs (although there was a rumour that some of those costs were being met elsewhere).

Then a publishing house called Magicalia bought visordown.com to complement their motorcycle magazine, “TWO”. Initially things got off to a bad start with TWO including some content from visordown.com in an issue without asking for permission to do so.

It also appeared that visordown’s free and easy, say what you like attitude was being clamped down on by its new owners.

In the meantime, vBulletin announced that the latest version of their software – version 3.7 – was being developed with user blogs (basically extended user profile pages) and user galleries to make what was already the best message board software even better.

So when an announcement was made a little while back seeking testers for the new version of visordown.com and when the board was turned off yesterday for an upgrade, I was quietly pleased.

And then they re-opened the board today. It’s been moved to a different server now running different ASP board software. A server that appears to be common to the rest of the Magicalia sites all running the same board software. No doubt that decision makes sense to a large company running a number of message boards: one set of architecture to support. Of course that throws aside the history and treats visordown.com as a new site rather than an established one.

And the ‘new’ board software is, frankly, rubbish compared with vBulletin. It also appears from all the server error messages I was getting this evening when trying to post new threads or reply to existing ones, that the server or the software (or a combination of the two) cannot cope with the traffic that visordown.com generates.

I expect that the regular users will soon get fed up with the board issues and the lack of features they were used to before.

Let that be a lesson to us all…

Yuku Pricing Finally Revealed!

Well it’s still not entirely clear if yuku is in beta or not: the home page says nothing about the beta status but the yuku help wiki still has beta references and graphics and as anyone who’s using it can see, the software is still full of bugs and the promised features are not all present.

But they’ve revealed prices at last!
http://www.yuku.com/home/goldstory/

$72 for 12 months up to 50,000 page views per month, though how they’ll be working out what page views are with AJAX architecture is anyone’s guess. $72 for 12 months now instead of $54 on ezboard which means a one-third price increase!

Over 50,000 page views?

http://www.yuku.com/home/goldpricing/

“Advertising can be removed from community pages at a rate of $0.20 per 1,000 ads served. The minimum contribution is US $1.00.”

So if ezboard decide to litter the site with ads, that cash will go in a moment…

What about Yuku Supporter?

http://www.yuku.com/home/supporterstory/

“Supporters receive 100 MB of image hosting space. Non-Supporters receive only 30 MB”

Oh I’m sorry, didn’t users get offered 1TB of storage for free?

So, if your “enterprise-quality hosting and software” falls over or you’re fed up with paying someone else to have access to your account - as they do on Yuku - then try another option.

If you go to DreamHost and enter the promo code EZSAVE50, you’ll even get $50 off the first year’s hosting price of $119.40 (you pay $69.40 if you use the promo code) and that includes domain name, e-mail, 500GB of storage (increases @2GB a week) and 5TB of bandwidth, PHP, MySQL, Ruby on Rails, CGI, “real” web statistics, one-click installs of blogging, message board and other software, etc.

It’s a no-brainer…

Barclays – Those Lost Dollars

Surprise, surprise! Barclays couldn’t be arsed to call me back as they had promised.

So I rang 0845 7555555 again and went through thus usual palaver of them not being able to find the account on their system before I was transferred to a supervisor. I asked her for the direct dial telephone number before she transferred me through, which she gave me before … cutting me off!

I rang the number she had give me which was, of course, the wrong one. I managed to get yet another number from this department to ring which was 01202 648773 and I rang them.

No apparent notes on their system. After a few minutes, the woman took all my details, gave me a case reference and said that someone would call me back within 48 hours and hopefully find out what had happened to those cheques.

I asked why my account had not already been credited with the money given that they had acknowledged receipt of the cheques and that it was clearly their problem and not mine if they chose to lose them. She said she would put a note to that effect on the case notes…

Barclays – Losing My Money

Beware if you dare to want to accept cheques in any other currency than Sterling.

The UK Banks really don’t want to know - in my experience - unless you are a business. If you can find a bank that will open a US Dollar account, they usually ignore the money they will be making on holding the foreign currency and instead they will want to charge you a significant sum for holding an account in a foreign currency.

Barclays do have a “Currency Call Deposit Account” though which does not make a monthly charge but instead pays no interest on the first $2,999 but then pays a massive 0.25%. Wow!

Then of course, there’s the small issue that that account does not give you a cheque book or debit card to make any withdrawals or payments nor does it provide you with a credit book to pay cheques or cash in with!

The problem then comes when you go to your local branch - the one who allegedly holds the account (it’s their sort code and branch on the quarterly statements) - to try to pay cheques in. They’re used(ish) to people presenting cheques on a “negotiation basis” into their Sterling accounts. Barclays charge a fee for this and you then get credited with the balance at whatever the then excahnge rates are. I don’t want to halve the face value of the cheques I receive and I live in hope of being able to eventually use my US Dollar account to trade with US-based companies and individuals.

So presenting a US Dollar cheque or cheques for payment into a US Dollar account, I want them handled on a “collection basis” which is how they I presume they should be handled.

Unfortunately, most of the local branch staff DHAFC and frankly I get fed up of going through this palaver every time I have a cheque to pay in, so I tend to wait until I have two or three and then pay them in at once. Depending upon how the staff at the branch have mishandled the credit slip, I sometimes get a letter acknowledging receipt or telling me they cannot negotiate the cheques and are simply going to present them on a collection basis instead.

So on 7 September 2007, I paid in three US Dollar cheques totalling just $88.99. On 12 September 2007, I received a letter which said:

“We have received your cheque(s) for the sum of USD$88.99, which you have requested we present on a negotiation basis…”

I just want the cheque paid into my account with as little fuss (and as little fee) as possible.

Then on 22 October 2007 - 6 weeks after I paid the cheques in… - I received a letter telling me that they had “received payment for this collection and have today credited [my] account … USD 38.40…”

And the statement arrived today showing only $38.40 has been credited to my account.

So I rang Barclays on 0845 7555555 which is the number which appears on my statements and on the letters they write (unless they simply don’t state a number anywhere which is a regular occurrence too).

This puts you through to a call centre on the Indian sub-contintent after you negotiate the electronic call system which doesn’t like you failing to enter a bank card number or telephone banking password, neither of which are provided with the account…

Eventually you talk to someone who asks you repeatedly for the sort code and number of your account. You know full well they cannot find it on their system as these accounts are ‘handled’ by Barclays International in Poole (the ones who once sent back a large fee deposit from an Italian client because despite quoting the sort code and account number for my account, they didn’t recognise the - incomplete - branch address and apparently Barclays are happy for more than one customer to have the same account number, just at  different branch…).

So after 37 minutes and two transfers, I eventually spoke to a guy in Poole who is as I type this trying to find the cheques in their system. As I said to him, I paid them into my local branch and they acknowledged receipt of the cheques, so if they’ve lost them, that’s their problem not mine.

He’s going to ring me back when he finds them…

Tesco Opticians

I wanted to re-order some contact lenses this morning. My prescription should be reviewed on 18 May 2008, apparently, so I was not allowed to order six months’ supply.

Now by my reckoning, I ought to be able to order four or five months’ supply but Tesco only offer me the option of three, six or twelve months and as they’re blocking me from ordering beyond May, I’m kinda stuffed.

So if I ordered just three months’ supply, what would they want me to do for April and May? Walk around blindly? Use lenses I should have binned?

Stupid system.

So I have placed two order for three months’ supply each! We shall see what orders they will accept…

O2 Web Top-Ups

I went to top up my kids’ mobiles with some calling credit and as usual wanted to pay with my debit card. O2 have recently changed their web top-up so that you don’t need to log-in: just enter the number to top up, card and address details and voila!

For the first one…

When it then comes to topping up a second mobile with the same card, it gets refused every time. Great system, eh?